linerartist.blogg.se

Liquidtext vs marginnote 3
Liquidtext vs marginnote 3






liquidtext vs marginnote 3
  1. LIQUIDTEXT VS MARGINNOTE 3 HOW TO
  2. LIQUIDTEXT VS MARGINNOTE 3 PDF

The developer has made significant strides in the past 12 months updating and upgrading the interface, fixing major instability issues, and adding creative new features. If I were to put my money on one of these apps, or any of their competitors, it will be MarginNote. I use MarginNote when I am researching a topic across a library of files and want to have consolidated notes.Įdit: I believe MarginNote is an excellent research tool for note taking and correlating / aggregating across multiple documents. I use LiquidText when I want to take reading notes on a single file. The app can also export OmniOutliner files, but it exports in a dated and somewhat ugly formatted OmniOutliner format.) mmap files frequently choke on the thing that MarginNote exports. mmap MindJet file as an export option – apps that read. The app also uses an out of date and poorly formed.

LIQUIDTEXT VS MARGINNOTE 3 HOW TO

(I don’t think the developer understands how to create well-formatted export files. The exported/imported RTFDs are ugly and very poorly formatted. There is no synchronization between MarginNote and DEVONthink. You have to export the notes as RTFD files, and then import them to DEVONthink. Getting notes out of MarginNote to DEVONthink is a weakness.

liquidtext vs marginnote 3

(LiquidText also supports multiple documents in the same workspace, but not as robustly as does MarginNote, in my opinion.) It is a very robust study/research environment. MarginNote also supports capturing all or parts of web pages as part of the “study” workspace, handwritten notes, comments nested inside other comments, links between comments, etc. The strength of this is that you can associate several PDFs into the same “study” workspace in MarginNote and take notes, creating an outline or mind map of notes, across all those documents.

LIQUIDTEXT VS MARGINNOTE 3 PDF

MarginNote keeps a copy of the PDF internally to the MarginNote application. MarginNote, on the other hand, does not open documents via Files and cannot save the annotations back to DEVONthink to Go (or DEVONthink on macOS). This is a weakness – LiquidText supports a subset of standard Adobe-style annotations as well as its own unique annotation figures. Though you can add handwritten annotations to the file in LiquidText, those handwritten annotations are not saved to the PDF and need to be exported.

liquidtext vs marginnote 3

With regard to LiquidText, you can open a document from a DEVONthink database stored in DEVONthink to Go on iOS via Files, annotate the file, and save those annotations to the original in DEVONthink to Go. I assume when you say “using … MarginNotes3 (or LiquidNotes ) with DEVONThink ” that you understand that MarginNote is available on iOS and macOS, but LiquidText is iOS-only?īoth applications have strengths and weaknesses. There are some very good tools for that.I use both LiquidText and MarginNote 3, depending on context and what I want to do. Please note: Im not asking for polar bookshelf to be turned into a reference manager (which docear also does, although very badly). I think being able to organize you annotations (highlights and area highlights) + short text (or MD) notes in mind maps, would be a killer feature for polar bookshelf and make it a very powerful research tool. It is unfortunately not developed any more. I am a very big fan of the program docear, which can import annotations and highlights from a pdf (or other sources) and allow you to organize the annotations in mind maps. This feature would be able to tell which papers (video webpages etc) cover this topic and what did they say via the annotations. It would be extremely useful to be able to organize the annotations by making groups or topics, while still maintaining the association to the source paper. As far as I can see annotations are associated only to an article (webpage video etc in the database). However it seems to miss the second, where one would organize the information from multiple sources in order to get an overview of a field, both historically and the current state of the art. I think that polar bookshelf is right on the mark with the the integration with anki in order to help achieve the first task.

liquidtext vs marginnote 3

Two important tasks when doing research are to learn (remember or retain) and to organize knowledge. Second: I have a feature that I would like to request: First: Thank you for making this very nice program!








Liquidtext vs marginnote 3